Mycoplasma conjunctivae genome annotation project<itle> <meta name="keywords" content="" /> <meta name="description" content="" /> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css" /> </head> <body> <div id="header"> <div id="header_inner"> <h1>The Mycoplasma conjunctivae genome sequencing, annotation and analysis</h1> </div> </div> <div id="main"> <div id="lcol"> <div id="menu"> <ul> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/index.html">Home</a></li> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/mycdb.htm">Database Search</a></li> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/GenomeProjector/">Genome Viewer</a></li> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/docs/FM864216.embl">EMBL entry</a></li> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/acknowledgement.htm">Acknowledgements</a></li> <li><a href="http://myconj.vital-it.ch/references.htm">References</a></li> </ul> </div> <div id="menu_end"></div> </div> <div id="rcol"> <div id="rcontent"> <h1>References</h1> <p>1. Phylogeny of some mycoplasmas from ruminants based on 16S rRNA sequences and definition of a new cluster within the hominis group. Pettersson B, Uhlén M, Johansson KE. 4, 1996, Int J Syst Bacteriol., Vol. 46, pp. 1093-1098. </p> <p>2. Mycoplasmas: A Distinct Cytoskeleton for Wall-Less Bacteria. Balish MF, Krause DC. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol., Vol. 11, pp. 244–255. </p> <p>3. Being pathogenic, plastic, and sexual while living with a nearly minimal bacterial genome. Sirand-Pugnet P, Lartigue C, Marenda M, Jacob D, Barré A, Barbe V, Schenowitz C, Mangenot S, Couloux A, Segurens B, de Daruvar A, Blanchard A, Citti C. 5, 2007, PLoS Genet., Vol. 3, p. e75. </p> <p>4. A phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas: Basis for their classification. Weisburg WG, Tully JG, Rose DL, Petzel JP, Oyaizu H, et al. 1989, J Bacteriol , Vol. 171, pp. 6455–6467. </p> <p>5. Phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas. Woese CR, Maniloff J, Zablen LB. 1980, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 77, pp. 494–498. </p> <p>6. Hostpathogen interactions in mycoplasma pathogenesis: Virulence and survival strategies of minimalist prokaryotes. Rosengarten R, Citti C, Glew M, Lischewski A, Droesse M, et al. 2000, Int J Med Microbiol, Vol. 290, pp. 15–25. </p> <p>7. Phenotypic diversity and cell invasion in host subversion by pathogenic mycoplasmas. Citti C, Browning GF, Rosengarten R. 2005, Horizon Bioscience, pp. 439–484. </p> <p>8. Molecular epidemiology of Mycoplasma conjunctivae in Caprinae: transmission across species in natural outbreaks. Belloy L, Janovsky M, Vilei EM, Pilo P, Giacometti M, Frey J. 4, 2003, Appl Environ Microbiol., Vol. 69, pp. 1913-1919. </p> <p>9. Characterization of LppS, an adhesin of Mycoplasma conjunctivae. Belloy L, Vilei EM, Giacometti M, Frey J. Pt. 1, 2003, Microbiology., Vol. 149, pp. 185-193. </p> <p> 10. Epidemic caprine keratoconjunctivitis: recovery of Mycoplasma conjunctivae and its possible role in pathogenesis. . Baas EJ, Trotter SL, Franklin RM, Barile MF. 3, Infect Immun., Vol. 18, pp. 806-815. </p> <p> 11. Mycoplasma conjunctivae infection is not maintained in alpine chamois in eastern Switzerland. Giacometti M, Janovsky M, Jenny H, Nicolet J, Belloy L, Goldschmidt-Clermont E, Frey J. 2, 2002, J Wildl Dis., Vol. 38, pp. 297-304. </p> <p> 12. Hofmann, H. Kérato-conjonctivite. Fleau des animaux domestiques et sauvages. Coire : Société grisonne des sciences naturelles, 1999. </p> <p> 13. Validation and diagnostic efficacy of a TaqMan real-time PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma conjunctivae in the eyes of infected Caprinae. Vilei EM, Bonvin-Klotz L, Zimmermann L, Ryser-Degiorgis MP, Giacometti M, Frey J. 2, 2007, J Microbiol Methods., Vol. 70, pp. 384-386. </p> <p> 14. Detection of specific Mycoplasma conjunctivae antibodies in the sera of sheep with infectious keratoconjunctivitis. Belloy L, Giacometti M, Abdo EM, Nicolet J, Krawinkler M, Janovsky M, Bruderer U, Frey J. 2, 2001, Vet Res., Vol. 32, pp. 155-164. </p> <p> 15. Annotation, comparison and databases for hundreds of bacterial genomes. Medigue C, Moszer I. 2007, Research in Microbiology., Vol. 158, pp. 724-736. </p> <p> 16. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Oinn T, Addis M, Ferris J, Marvin D, Senger M, Greenwood M, Carver T, Glover K, Pocock MR, Wipat A, Li P. 17, 2004, Bioinformatics., Vol. 20, pp. 3045-3054. </p> <p> 17. Isolation and characterization of Mycoplasma conjunctivae sp. n. from sheep and goats with keratoconjunctivitis. Barile MF, Del Giudice RA, Tully JG. 1972, Infect. Immun., Vol. 5, pp. 70-76. </p> <p> 18. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Pitcher DG, Saunders NA, Owen RJ. 1989, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., Vol. 8, pp. 151-156. </p> <p> 19. Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly. Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Pop M. 3, 2008, Genome Biol., Vol. 9, p. R55. </p> <p> </p> <p> 20. Prediction of probable genes by Fourier analysis of genomic sequences. Tiwari S, Ramachandran S, Bhattacharya A, Bhattacharya S, Ramaswamy R. 3, 1997, Comput Appl Biosci., Vol. 13, pp. 263-270. </p> <p> 21. Correlation approach to identify coding regions in DNA sequences. Ossadnik SM, Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AL, Havlin S, Mantegna RN, Peng CK, Simons M, Stanley HE. 1, 1994, Biophys J. , Vol. 67, pp. 64-70. </p> <p> 22. Self-identification of protein-coding regions in microbial genomes. Audic S, Claverie JM. 17, 1998, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. , Vol. 95, pp. 10026-10031. </p> <p> 23. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 6, 2007, Bioinformatics, Vol. 23, pp. 673-679. </p> <p> 24. GenMark: parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Borodovsky M, McIninchJ. 1993, Comput. Chem., Vol. 17, pp. 123–133. </p> <p> 25. CONSORF: a consensus prediction system for prokaryotic coding sequences. Kang S, Yang SJ, Kim S, Bhak J. 22, 2007, Bioinformatics., Vol. 23, pp. 3088-3090. </p> <p> 26. Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes. Frishman D, Mironov A, Mewes HW, Gelfand M. 12, 1998, Nucleic Acids Res. , Vol. 26, pp. 2941-2947. </p> <p> 27. CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. Badger JH, Olsen GJ. 4, 1999, Mol Biol Evol., Vol. 16, pp. 512-524. </p> <p> 28. FrameD: A flexible program for quality check and gene prediction in prokaryotic genomes and noisy matured eukaryotic sequences. Schiex T, Gouzy J, Moisan A, de Oliveira Y. 13, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res. , Vol. 31, pp. 3738-3741. </p> <p> 29. YACOP: Enhanced gene prediction obtained by a combination of existing methods. Tech M, Merkl R. 4, 2003, In Silico Biol., Vol. 3, pp. 441-451. </p> <p> 30. Ab initio gene identification: prokaryote genome annotation with GeneScan and GLIMMER. Aggarwal G, Ramaswamy R. 1 Suppl 1, 2002, J Biosci., Vol. 27, pp. 7-14. </p> <p> 31. McElwain, M. A Critical Review of Gene Prediction Software. Computational Molecular Biology (Biochem 218). [Online] 2007. http://biochem218.stanford.edu/Projects%20Winter%202007/Mcelwain.pdf. </p> <p> 32. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. 2, 1998, Nucleic Acids Res. , Vol. 26, pp. 544-548. </p> <p> 33. Rfam: an RNA family database. Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR. 1, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res, Vol. 31, pp. 439-441. </p> <p> 34. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy S, Bateman A. 2005, Nucleic Acids Res., Vol. 33, pp. D121-D124. </p> <p> 35. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Eddy SR, Lowe TM. 5, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 25, pp. 955–964. </p> <p> 36. Basic local alignment search tool. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990, J. Mol. Biol., Vol. 215, pp. 403-410. </p> <p> 37. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Rice, P. Longden,I. and Bleasby,A. 6, 2000, Trends in Genetics, Vol. 16, pp. 276-277. </p> <p> 38. Elzanowski, A, et al. NCBI Taxonomy Homepage. NCBI - National Center for Biotechnology Information. [Online] July 23, 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govaxonomy/Utils/wprintgc.cgi?mode=t#SG4. </p> <p> 39. Automated annotation of microbial proteomes in SWISS-PROT. Gattiker A, Michoud K, Rivoire C, Auchincloss AH, Coudert E, Lima L, Kersey P, Pagni M, Sigrist C, Lachaize C, Veuthey A-L, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A. 2003, Comput. Biol. Chem. , Vol. 27, pp. 49-58. </p> <p> 40. An HMM model for coiled-coil domains and a comparison with PSSM based predictions. Delorenzi M, Speed T. 4, 2002, Bioinformatics, Vol. 18, pp. 617-625. </p> <p> 41. InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature recognition methods in InterPro. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R. 9, 2001, Bioinformatics, Vol. 17, pp. 847-848. </p> <p> </p> <p> 42. Web services at the European bioinformatics institute. Labarga A, Valentin F, Anderson M, Lopez R. Web Server issue, s.l. : Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, Vol. 35, pp. 6-11. </p> <p> 43. Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. Wootton, J.C. and Federhen, S. s.l. : Computers & Chemistry, 1993, Vol. 17, pp. 149-163. </p> <p> 44. Institute, European Bioinformatics. EBI Submissions. [Online] 2006. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Submissions/. </p> <p> 45. The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database: major new developments. Stoesser G, Baker W, van den Broek A, Garcia-Pastor M, Kanz C, Kulikova T, Leinonen R, Lin Q, Lombard V, Lopez R, Mancuso R, Nardone F, Stoehr P, Tuli MA, Tzouvara K, Vaughan R. 1, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res. , Vol. 31, pp. 17-22. </p> <p> 46. The EMBL sequence version archive. Leinonen R, Nardone F, Oyewole O, Redaschi N, Stoehr P. 14, 2003, Bioinformatics, Vol. 19, pp. 1861-1862. </p> <p> 47. MolliGen, a database dedicated to the comparative genomics of Mollicutes. . Barré A, de Daruvar A, Blanchard A. Database issue, 2004, Nucleic Acids Res., Vol. 32, pp. D307-310. </p> <p> 48. CAAT-Box, contigs-Assembly and Annotation Tool-Box for genome sequencing projects. Frangeul, L, et al. 5, s.l. : Bioinformatics, 2004, Vol. 20, pp. 790-797. </p> <p> 49. A metabolic enzyme as a primary virulence factor of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides small colony. Pilo P, Vilei EM, Peterhans E, Bonvin-Klotz L, Stoffel MH, Dobbelaere D, Frey J. 19, 2005, J Bacteriol., Vol. 187, pp. 6824-6831. </p> <p> 50. IS FINDER DATABASE. [Online] http://www-is.biotoul.fr/is/IS_infos/IS3_family.html. </p> <p> 51. Molecular biology of Mycoplasmas. Dybvig, K and Voelker, L. s.l. : Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1996, Vol. 50, pp. 25–57. </p> <p> 52. Identification and characterization of IS1138, a transposable element from Mycoplasma pulmonis that belongs to the IS3 family. Bhugra, B. and K. Dybvig. s.l. : Mol.Microbiol., 1993, Vol. 7, pp. 577-584. </p> <p> 53. Insertion sequences as variability generators in the Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and M. synoviae genomes. Silva-Loreto EL, Freitas-Ortiz M, Rebelo-Porto J. 1, 2007, Genetics and Molecular Biology., Vol. 30, pp. 283-289. </p> <p> 54. The genome sequence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 232, the agent of swine mycoplasmosis. Minion FC, Lefkowitz EJ , Madsen ML, Cleary BJ, Swartzell SM, Mahairas GG. 21, s.l. : J Bacteriol, 2004, Vol. 186, pp. 7123-7133. </p> <p> 55. G-language Genome Analysis Environment: a workbench for nucleotide sequence data mining. Arakawa K, Mori K, Ikeda K, Matsuzaki T, Kobayashi Y, Tomita M. 2, 2003, Bioinformatics. , Vol. 19, pp. 305-306. </p> <p> 56. The genome sequence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 232, the agent of swine mycoplasmosis. Minion FC, Lefkowitz EJ, Madsen ML, Cleary BJ, Swartzell SM, Mahairas GG. 21, 2004, J Bacteriol., Vol. 186, pp. 7123-7133. </p> <p> 57. The genome sequence of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides SC type strain PG1T, the causative agent of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP). Westberg J, Persson A, Holmberg A, Goesmann A, Lundeberg J, Johansson KE, Pettersson B, Uhlén M. 2, 2004, Genome Res. , Vol. 14, pp. 221-227. </p> <p> 58. The complete genome and proteome of Mycoplasma mobile. Jaffe JD, Stange-Thomann N, Smith C, DeCaprio D, Fisher S, Butler J, Calvo S, Elkins T, FitzGerald MG, Hafez N, Kodira CD, Major J, Wang S, Wilkinson J, Nicol R, Nusbaum C, Birren B, Berg HC, Church GM. 8, 2004, Genome Res., Vol. 14, pp. 1447-1461. </p> <p> 59. M-GCAT: interactively and efficiently constructing large-scale multiple genome comparison frameworks in closely related species. Treangen TJ, Messeguer X. 2006, BMC Bioinformatics. , Vol. 7, p. 433. </p> <p> 60. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. 4, 1998, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev., Vol. 62, pp. 1094-1156. </p> <div class="divider"></div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="footer"> <table> <tr> <td><img src="images/Unige.png" width="60%" height="60%"/><d> <td align="center"><img src="images/SIB10.png" width="20%" height="20%"/><d> <td><img src="images/VetBern.png" width="100%" height="100%"/><d> <r> </div> <div style="font-size: 0.8em; text-align: center; margin-top: 1.0em; margin-bottom: 1.0em;"> </div> </body> </html>